1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,800
Houston We Have a Podcast. Welcome to the official podcast of the NASA Johnson Space Center, episode 419,

2
00:00:07,260 --> 00:00:12,880
telling time on other worlds. I'm Dane Turner and I'll be your host today. On this podcast,

3
00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:19,540
we bring in the experts, scientists, engineers and astronauts, all to let you know what's going on in the world of human spaceflight and more.

4
00:00:19,980 --> 00:00:28,100
Days, hours, minutes, time is so ubiquitous to our everyday lives that we often just think of it as numbers on a clock face.

5
00:00:28,420 --> 00:00:34,280
We forget that these numbers are tied to the motion of our planet, but what do we do when we aren't on Earth?

6
00:00:34,460 --> 00:00:39,560
How do we tell time in a place where maybe morning, afternoon and evening,

7
00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:47,740
don't necessarily align with our typical earthly 24-hour day or even seconds themselves may tick faster on the moon.

8
00:00:47,740 --> 00:00:50,160
On this episode we have Kevin Coggins,

9
00:00:50,340 --> 00:00:56,340
Deputy Associate Administrator for NASA's Space Communication and Navigation or SCaN program.

10
00:00:56,700 --> 00:01:06,200
To help us understand how NASA plans to keep time on other planetary bodies and why accurate timekeeping is so important to spaceflight, let's get started.

11
00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:32,800
Hi Kevin, thank you so much for coming on Houston We Have a Podcast today. Hey, thanks for having me.

12
00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:36,680
Can you tell us a little bit about your background and how you got started NASA?

13
00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:42,180
Yeah, so let's see. It's a strange background. It's a strange loop that got me to NASA.

14
00:01:42,180 --> 00:01:48,980
Join the Marine Corps at 17. I'm electrical engineer, worked in the defense and aerospace industry for many years.

15
00:01:49,300 --> 00:01:54,040
I found myself doing position navigation and timing for the Department of War, and

16
00:01:54,820 --> 00:01:58,860
then low and behold, I found myself doing space communications and navigation at NASA.

17
00:01:59,500 --> 00:02:06,780
So you've been doing the things that SCaN does for most of your careers, that right? In some way shape or form.

18
00:02:07,580 --> 00:02:15,740
And so SCaN is NASA's Space Communication and Navigation program. Can you use a little more information on what that really covers?

19
00:02:16,380 --> 00:02:24,980
Sure thing. So SCaN is the lifeline, the line of which all data flows to and from any space mission we send up.

20
00:02:25,660 --> 00:02:32,940
Whether it's the International Space Station, the Artemis 2 mission to the moon, the Voyager spacecraft or Europa Clipper.

21
00:02:33,420 --> 00:02:41,340
We manage the Deep Space Network, which are these huge antennas around the world in Madrid, Canberra and California.

22
00:02:41,740 --> 00:02:51,500
We manage the near space network, which are a bunch of smaller antennas to talk to, rockets that we launch and things that are orbiting the Earth for science missions and the ISS.

23
00:02:51,980 --> 00:03:00,300
And we also manage some satellite constellations, and then we have a lot of commercial space partners that bring a lot of capability to help us as well.

24
00:03:01,100 --> 00:03:09,740
So is this a lot like, you know, we're all used to GPS on our phones now these days? Is this like a space GPS?

25
00:03:11,500 --> 00:03:19,740
Yeah, so it's communications, but it's also positioning, navigation and timing or PNT, which you could say is space GPS.

26
00:03:19,900 --> 00:03:28,300
We're putting right now GPS around the moon in a program that's got one of these weird NASA acronyms. We have a ton of acronyms here.

27
00:03:28,300 --> 00:03:35,180
This one's LCRNS, L-C-R-N-S, lunar communications and navigation relay system.

28
00:03:35,660 --> 00:03:46,220
And it's going to include not just the ability to do communications on the moon, but to have GPS-like capability on the moon, just like we have on Earth.

29
00:03:46,780 --> 00:03:54,380
Okay, and these are also communication satellites, so like beaming phone calls and TV signals. Is that about right?

30
00:03:54,860 --> 00:03:55,820
That's exactly right.

31
00:03:56,540 --> 00:04:03,820
Amazing. Okay, so how do these capabilities relate to timekeeping?

32
00:04:05,420 --> 00:04:13,740
See, that is that is the magic question. And that's the question where some people are going to head nod and say I like that answer.

33
00:04:13,820 --> 00:04:25,580
And the people that are really into precision time are going to head nod and say yeah, it's a little harder than that, because it is one of the weirdest things I've ever encountered as my career is time.

34
00:04:26,220 --> 00:04:29,980
And you know, it starts with a question like what is it? What even is time, right?

35
00:04:31,020 --> 00:04:40,220
On the Earth, we have all these atomic clocks. And they're all just a little bit different because clocks drift and believe it or not,

36
00:04:40,860 --> 00:04:47,500
what they're looking at in the clock are oscillations of atoms and gravity affects the oscillation of the atom.

37
00:04:48,300 --> 00:04:53,100
So on the Earth, we're in this Earth gravity well. We're kind of all in the same gravity.

38
00:04:53,660 --> 00:05:02,620
And all these clocks are rotating on this planet. They're experiencing different forces and vibrations and kind of the same gravity.

39
00:05:02,940 --> 00:05:18,060
And they all have to work together to vote to figure out what time is it based on, you know, not only the oscillations of their individual atoms, but also the, you know, kind of like averaging out and norming between their differences.

40
00:05:18,940 --> 00:05:26,700
That's time. That's one definition of time. The moon has different gravity than the Earth. So how do we do it there?

41
00:05:28,860 --> 00:05:35,740
You're starting to break my mind here because I'm realizing that time is so tied to gravity that you're going to get different time.

42
00:05:37,100 --> 00:05:40,860
Basically, anywhere you go, that's 100% right.

43
00:05:42,140 --> 00:05:55,900
So these atomic clocks, are they placed in, are they all at sea level? Are they placed different altitudes? How do we get that average time on the Earth that becomes our Earth time?

44
00:05:55,980 --> 00:06:02,460
You know, it's a, it's a little more complicated. I told you no one's going to like the answers here. No one's going to like it.

45
00:06:03,580 --> 00:06:14,220
Well, what's a day here? It's the rotation of the Earth, right? 24 hours. And how do we know where to begin the measurement and end the measurement of that rotation?

46
00:06:14,780 --> 00:06:20,540
We actually have to pay attention to the reference frame of how the Earth sits in space.

47
00:06:21,020 --> 00:06:30,060
And so we have to look at things that are really far from the Earth. We measure signals off of pulsars. We measure positioning of stars.

48
00:06:30,620 --> 00:06:39,020
They take that data down and calculate it with the clocks to figure out what time is here on the Earth.

49
00:06:39,660 --> 00:06:47,980
And what's really interesting about it is the rotation of the Earth changes a little bit.

50
00:06:48,940 --> 00:06:58,940
And we have this thing called leap seconds. Every once in a while, we shave a few seconds off the clock because, you know, a second is not to find the same way as the rotation of the Earth.

51
00:06:59,100 --> 00:07:07,340
But we have to make a mesh. So there's constant adjustment and calculation. And so there are these computers that take in all this data.

52
00:07:08,780 --> 00:07:17,340
Things that measure the stars, get factored into that. All of these clocks that are at different altitudes.

53
00:07:18,300 --> 00:07:24,380
They're, you know, because they're on the ground or in the ground somewhere in the world in the United States. A lot of these clocks.

54
00:07:25,020 --> 00:07:33,260
And all this data has to go back to one of a few places for this calculation. I call it all this calculation to figure out what time is it.

55
00:07:34,780 --> 00:07:41,900
It's incredible. You know, we're taught in school that a day is the time it takes for the Earth to revolve. And in hours,

56
00:07:42,860 --> 00:07:47,660
one 24th of that and then a second is one sixtieths of a minute. But

57
00:07:48,780 --> 00:07:52,620
it were, we're almost moving away from the definition of

58
00:07:53,660 --> 00:08:00,380
of the Earth's movement and really putting this in into context of you, you said

59
00:08:01,260 --> 00:08:11,340
the vibration of an atom. Is that right? That's right. The vibrations of an atom. It could be rubidium. It could be cesium. It could be different atoms that vibrate.

60
00:08:12,300 --> 00:08:20,140
A different number of times in what's called one second. We just count those vibrations until we get to that magic number for whatever atom it is.

61
00:08:21,580 --> 00:08:27,020
And so that's what becomes one second. And then we extrapolate all of the other times from that second.

62
00:08:28,060 --> 00:08:40,060
Well, that helps us figure out what the second is. And then yeah, we start to extrapolate. And we have, you know, we have to do a lot of calculation based on other measurements to figure out, you know, that second.

63
00:08:40,860 --> 00:08:45,260
That day, et cetera. And where we are in the Earth reference frame.

64
00:08:47,820 --> 00:08:53,420
Wow. It's okay. It's totally wild. The people that do this work are extremely passionate about it.

65
00:08:53,900 --> 00:08:57,180
They can have an argument with you for hours and you wouldn't understand a thing they said.

66
00:08:59,980 --> 00:09:09,260
It's really wild. You go into a topic like this and think, I know what time is. I have a clock. I have a watch. And then all of a sudden you start talking about it and you realize that

67
00:09:10,220 --> 00:09:17,500
time, you know, time is a construct, but also time is something so complex that's incredible.

68
00:09:19,020 --> 00:09:36,220
You know, it's very important in, it's very important to have very precise time measurements because when you're talking about your position measurement, the way these GPS satellites work and the way they'll work on the moon in Mars one day, is each of the satellites is sending you a signal.

69
00:09:36,620 --> 00:09:47,180
And your GPS is calculating the time difference between those signals and a nanosecond is enough to travel about one third of a meter.

70
00:09:47,980 --> 00:09:57,020
And so, you know, like on Mars, clocks will tick an average of 477 millionth of a second faster than clocks on Earth because of gravity.

71
00:09:57,900 --> 00:10:00,540
The gravity is different. The eccentric orbit is different.

72
00:10:01,260 --> 00:10:07,900
And so, it can increase or decrease this amount by as much as 226 microseconds a day over the course of the Martian year.

73
00:10:08,460 --> 00:10:17,260
So, why does that matter? 477 microseconds is enough time to travel 143,000 kilometers at the speed of light.

74
00:10:17,260 --> 00:10:22,460
And so, that's how much distance you get from those microseconds.

75
00:10:22,860 --> 00:10:30,700
We need nanosecond accuracy to get down to a very precise positioning of where you are.

76
00:10:32,990 --> 00:10:44,510
Wow. So, you'd be off by thousands of kilometers, hundreds of thousands of kilometers if your clock was off by a very minuscule amount.

77
00:10:44,510 --> 00:10:48,830
That's right. That's why these precise clocks are so very important.

78
00:10:49,310 --> 00:10:51,310
Incredible.

79
00:10:51,310 --> 00:10:53,310
Well, let's pick on the moon.

80
00:10:53,310 --> 00:10:59,390
Right? The moon, a single lunar day, is about 29.5 Earth days.

81
00:11:00,990 --> 00:11:08,990
That means if we were to base a day on the moon's natural cycles, the length of the day is going to be a lot longer than on the Earth.

82
00:11:09,550 --> 00:11:13,550
And gravity is different on the moon than the Earth.

83
00:11:13,550 --> 00:11:15,790
So, time is passing at a different rate.

84
00:11:16,510 --> 00:11:29,230
And so, it's a very difficult problem to figure out time and then extrapolate that to position on the surface of the moon unless you're doing it from within that reference frame.

85
00:11:31,070 --> 00:11:34,750
Except in the case of one mission at a time.

86
00:11:36,110 --> 00:11:39,870
If it's one mission at a time, that's the history of what we've done at NASA.

87
00:11:40,430 --> 00:11:48,030
When we've sent a spacecraft up like Apollo, we have clocks on Apollo.

88
00:11:48,670 --> 00:11:51,710
We have on the lander, we have clocks on the Earth.

89
00:11:52,270 --> 00:11:59,550
And we could just deal with, we could do that from the Earth and kind of pay attention to its surroundings, figure out where it's at and what time it is.

90
00:11:59,550 --> 00:12:02,590
Kind of like mission time, you could call it, but not lunar time.

91
00:12:03,390 --> 00:12:06,030
But now, we're talking about building a moon base.

92
00:12:06,750 --> 00:12:13,150
We're talking about rovers and landers and humans moving around the surface of the moon.

93
00:12:13,710 --> 00:12:18,030
You can't, from the Earth, do mission time individually for each of them.

94
00:12:18,030 --> 00:12:20,430
They have to be on the same time scale.

95
00:12:21,150 --> 00:12:22,830
And that means they need lunar time.

96
00:12:24,510 --> 00:12:27,390
Interesting. So, let's go back to that history real quick.

97
00:12:28,110 --> 00:12:37,630
So, using the idea of the reference frame with these historical missions like Mercury and Gemini and Apollo,

98
00:12:37,950 --> 00:12:40,350
we use the Earth reference frame then.

99
00:12:41,310 --> 00:12:45,390
What was the actual time keeping on that light?

100
00:12:46,830 --> 00:12:50,830
Well, it could have been a watch on someone's wrist, right?

101
00:12:51,470 --> 00:12:58,830
It could be a clock in one of the capsules or a clock in some other part of the system.

102
00:12:59,390 --> 00:13:04,510
And over the radio link, maybe you did some clock synchronization.

103
00:13:04,510 --> 00:13:10,030
And maybe it was really, really rough because you didn't have a GPS satellite, right?

104
00:13:10,030 --> 00:13:18,670
Given them positioning, it was, you were calculating their positioning based on ranging measurements from the communication signal

105
00:13:18,750 --> 00:13:23,950
and any other observations. And so, it was like laser focused on that one thing.

106
00:13:25,390 --> 00:13:28,910
And yeah, if that watch on Buzz Aldrin's wrist,

107
00:13:30,190 --> 00:13:36,830
what that he took to the moon was very accurate to the nanosecond, it would have drifted away

108
00:13:36,830 --> 00:13:41,070
from the time on the Earth, but it wasn't that accurate. So, it was very not as noticeable.

109
00:13:42,110 --> 00:13:46,190
And so, within that mission time, it was good enough. It was good enough, right?

110
00:13:46,670 --> 00:13:53,310
But when you're going to have some of the technologies we have on the Earth,

111
00:13:53,790 --> 00:13:58,670
like 5G connectivity across the surface assets and the network,

112
00:14:00,190 --> 00:14:05,150
people knowing where they are or machines knowing where they are with respect to where something

113
00:14:05,150 --> 00:14:11,150
else is, you've got to define, now you can't just do it as a one-off, you've got to define it for

114
00:14:11,230 --> 00:14:17,710
that reference frame that they're in. Okay, so for those early missions, having a synchronized

115
00:14:17,710 --> 00:14:23,710
clock set to an Earth time was enough to get them where they need to go because we didn't need the

116
00:14:23,710 --> 00:14:29,230
precision with the satellites and everything at the time. And then as we move into Shuttle,

117
00:14:29,230 --> 00:14:34,910
did that change then or was that still kind of the same idea? Well, you know,

118
00:14:35,710 --> 00:14:40,990
during Mercury and Gemini and Apollo and Shuttle, they use something called Mission

119
00:14:40,990 --> 00:14:46,750
Elapsed Time or Met, right? Kind of like a standardized, continuous counter, days, hours,

120
00:14:46,750 --> 00:14:52,670
minutes, seconds starts the exact moment of launch. For the space Shuttle, they continued using it,

121
00:14:52,670 --> 00:14:57,630
starting at liftoff. All Shuttle operations were planned relative to that mission clock.

122
00:14:58,430 --> 00:15:04,510
However, when they started becoming more reliant on digital avionics and satellite

123
00:15:04,510 --> 00:15:11,150
communications, they needed more precise synchronization. We actually put GPS receivers on the

124
00:15:11,150 --> 00:15:18,270
space Shuttle for some of that. And so we kind of started to move away from the mission clock to

125
00:15:18,270 --> 00:15:28,110
getting time, very accurate time, from Earth-based GPS. Today, the ISS uses coordinated universal time

126
00:15:28,750 --> 00:15:33,710
so that all the international partners and ground controllers can coordinate activities continuously.

127
00:15:33,710 --> 00:15:39,870
So we've kind of shifted away from mission time for the ISS. Artemis II is going to use Mission

128
00:15:39,870 --> 00:15:47,070
Elapsed Time as a primary operational timeline reference starting at launch. And so it's a single

129
00:15:47,070 --> 00:15:53,790
mission. It's going to take off. It's going to go around the moon. It's got ground controllers

130
00:15:53,790 --> 00:15:59,230
and our entire communication network aimed at it. And so we just need that mission alapsed time.

131
00:15:59,870 --> 00:16:05,390
But our broader moon to Mars architecture, as we start to do all these activities on the moon,

132
00:16:05,390 --> 00:16:07,630
we can't continue to use Mission Elapsed Time at all.

133
00:16:09,470 --> 00:16:16,590
Right. And that kind of mirrors our operations on the ISS, the ISS, while being kind of a

134
00:16:16,590 --> 00:16:22,110
singular focus is being focused on by so many different people that we need that one

135
00:16:22,110 --> 00:16:27,710
coordinate of universal time to work to and it's kind of like what we'll be doing on the moon when

136
00:16:27,710 --> 00:16:31,470
you have that moon base with all the multiple rovers and everything. Does that sound about right?

137
00:16:32,190 --> 00:16:37,710
That sounds absolutely right. Big difference is ISS is around the Earth, right? So it can use

138
00:16:37,710 --> 00:16:43,070
Earth's coordinated universal time. And when we go to the moon, we're going to need coordinated

139
00:16:43,070 --> 00:16:48,430
lunar time. So we've talked a little bit about some of the considerations here, but we're

140
00:16:49,550 --> 00:16:56,910
talking about a coordinated lunar time. We're talking about some place with a different gravity

141
00:16:56,990 --> 00:17:04,510
well with a different length of day and everything. What are these considerations that we need when

142
00:17:04,510 --> 00:17:12,350
we're exploring timekeeping on another body like the moon? Well, what's the gravity, right?

143
00:17:13,390 --> 00:17:17,390
Remember, we started this conversation with how gravity affects the

144
00:17:18,670 --> 00:17:23,150
oscillation of these atoms and how we measure them. So one of the things we have to pay attention

145
00:17:23,230 --> 00:17:30,110
is what's the gravity? What's the rotation of the planetary body we're going to be on? A

146
00:17:30,110 --> 00:17:40,750
Martian day is about 24 hours and 39 minutes. And so we have to pay attention to the

147
00:17:40,750 --> 00:17:46,670
Mars mission, what they're going to need locally with time, with positioning, but also there's a

148
00:17:46,670 --> 00:17:52,990
team back on Earth supporting them. In 2012, when Curiosity landed on Mars, the engineers worked on

149
00:17:52,990 --> 00:18:00,190
Mars time. And because of that, their work shifts on Earth moved about 39 minutes later each day

150
00:18:00,190 --> 00:18:07,230
to stay synchronized with the rover's local daylight cycle because daylight mattered. And so this

151
00:18:07,230 --> 00:18:13,070
helped them analyze data from the previous sol, quickly send commands for the next one, but it was

152
00:18:13,070 --> 00:18:19,230
something for these humans to adjust their normal schedules to. They had to work around the daylight,

153
00:18:19,710 --> 00:18:24,030
day night cycle on a different planetary body. That was tough on some of them.

154
00:18:25,310 --> 00:18:32,430
So they were waking up at Mars morning, whatever time that happened to be on Earth. And keeping

155
00:18:33,230 --> 00:18:40,590
their lunchtime was at Mars noon and their end of their day was near the Mars end of day. Is

156
00:18:40,590 --> 00:18:45,710
that right? They were living on the Mars time and just whatever happened to be on Earth, if it's

157
00:18:45,710 --> 00:18:51,470
a mill the night is a mill the night here? Exactly. That's exactly right. Imagine the chaos that

158
00:18:52,270 --> 00:18:57,870
meant for them and just and the adjustment for their family. When they ate, when they slept,

159
00:18:58,830 --> 00:19:06,270
it was quite an adjustment. Oh, I bet going to an Earth store when you're on Mars time is probably

160
00:19:06,270 --> 00:19:13,950
disorienting. Exactly. So our gravity and rotation, the only things that were really

161
00:19:15,710 --> 00:19:21,070
need to keep into consideration when we're building a time for another planet. I know you asked

162
00:19:21,070 --> 00:19:26,590
another planet, but I kind of want to pick on the moon. So let's talk about a complexity of the moon.

163
00:19:27,310 --> 00:19:34,510
The moon's not a planet and the moon has very specific dynamics that aren't the same as the Earth.

164
00:19:35,070 --> 00:19:42,190
We have to root our reference frame for the moon positionally and time to our reference frame on the

165
00:19:42,190 --> 00:19:48,590
Earth and the math of the math of figuring out positioning on the Earth with satellites around the

166
00:19:48,590 --> 00:19:54,190
Earth and clocks on the Earth is hard, but we figured it out. Now you've got to take that math

167
00:19:54,750 --> 00:19:58,750
and you've got to put it around the moon but keep it linked to the math around the Earth.

168
00:19:59,550 --> 00:20:05,630
And I say math because I just want to highlight this stuff's hard. There's a lot of constant

169
00:20:05,630 --> 00:20:12,910
calculations on how we're going to have to synchronize these clocks, have a lunar time reference

170
00:20:12,910 --> 00:20:20,670
scale, an Earth time reference scale where we'll be talking with those missions and make it work

171
00:20:20,670 --> 00:20:27,230
this seamlessly together. There's big questions like when you fly a rocket from the Earth reference

172
00:20:27,230 --> 00:20:34,590
system, where's that border with the moon where you switch clocks? Or do you just have two clocks now?

173
00:20:36,590 --> 00:20:41,790
It's going to be quite interesting because if the communication services in and around the moon

174
00:20:41,790 --> 00:20:48,350
depend on lunar time, when you move into that reference frame, you've got to switch to that time

175
00:20:48,350 --> 00:20:52,990
to be able to communicate with everything in that environment. It's things we've never encountered before.

176
00:20:54,990 --> 00:20:59,790
And to top it all off, everything's always in motion. That's something that I've had to learn

177
00:20:59,790 --> 00:21:05,710
when dealing with the orbital mechanics of the ISS and spacecraft and stuff. And the moon is

178
00:21:05,710 --> 00:21:10,270
no different. Everything is always in motion. So that's just another wrench in the system.

179
00:21:11,550 --> 00:21:19,550
Exactly. Exactly. Yeah, it's going to be fun. We're going to spend a lot of energy and brain power

180
00:21:20,030 --> 00:21:25,150
over the next few years figuring out how to do this and implement in capability.

181
00:21:25,470 --> 00:21:32,030
On this, that LCRNS project, I told you about that, lunar communications relay and nav system,

182
00:21:33,230 --> 00:21:39,710
we're going to start seeing satellites go up there in the next year or two. And we'll start

183
00:21:40,590 --> 00:21:45,630
building that reference frame around the moon, having those clocks begin to do their first ticks

184
00:21:46,190 --> 00:21:52,830
and start on these hard math problems so that when a receiver on the moon receives the signal from

185
00:21:52,830 --> 00:21:59,710
these satellites, it's getting that data from those precise clocks, but it can determine exactly

186
00:21:59,710 --> 00:22:07,230
where it is on the surface of the moon. That brings me to another challenge. Most people don't know,

187
00:22:07,230 --> 00:22:14,430
but there's groups in the government that work really hard to define how coordinates work on the

188
00:22:14,430 --> 00:22:22,190
surface of the earth. And they work really hard to make sure those, you know, with magnetic deviation

189
00:22:22,190 --> 00:22:28,430
at the poles, with the wobble of the earth and the shape of the earth, that they've got it well

190
00:22:28,430 --> 00:22:34,990
characterized so that a point is a point and it's always that place because the earth isn't

191
00:22:34,990 --> 00:22:38,670
static. It's just not set and still, it's moving, it's shifting and doing weird things.

192
00:22:39,470 --> 00:22:47,150
Well, we've got to do that same kind of work on the moon so that we can define, you know, a coordinate

193
00:22:47,150 --> 00:22:54,190
system so that when you receive these signals from these satellites and you do the math, the answer

194
00:22:54,190 --> 00:22:59,950
comes out the same coordinate every time, no matter when you took the measurement. That's hard.

195
00:23:00,830 --> 00:23:06,830
And there are some amazing people that work in this every day on the earth and I know I've talked

196
00:23:06,830 --> 00:23:13,630
to them recently. They're really excited to settle this on the moon. So with the earth, do you know what

197
00:23:13,630 --> 00:23:22,750
is that central point of the coordinate system or is there one? Oh yeah, now you pass in my knowledge

198
00:23:22,750 --> 00:23:28,510
here. I think that's one of their hotly debated topics as to what is that central point or is there

199
00:23:28,510 --> 00:23:33,790
a central point at all? That's part of the weird math they do. Oh yeah, I was just thinking about it.

200
00:23:33,790 --> 00:23:38,990
I'm like the North Pole, we think of that as static, but it shifts and then you've got plate

201
00:23:38,990 --> 00:23:44,190
tectonics so no matter where it is that you say, oh, you know, this point right here on this continent,

202
00:23:44,190 --> 00:23:48,830
well, that's not going to be, you know, in the exact same place and even just a year's time,

203
00:23:48,830 --> 00:23:53,550
it will move by a centimeter or two. We have a prime meridian. It gives us, it gives us on the

204
00:23:53,550 --> 00:23:58,830
surface a basic reference frame to measure off of. However, when you start to talk about what is the

205
00:23:58,830 --> 00:24:05,470
center point of the earth, you know, there's all kinds of questions like, you know, based on its motion,

206
00:24:05,470 --> 00:24:11,710
based on its mass, two different things. And based on its wobbling motion, that center point's

207
00:24:11,710 --> 00:24:17,390
probably moving around a little bit. But maps can handle things moving around. When you get the

208
00:24:17,390 --> 00:24:22,590
signals, you have to have an answer that comes out the other side of the calculator that says,

209
00:24:22,590 --> 00:24:29,790
I'm exactly at this location to some degree of accuracy. And you know, that's I think a continuing

210
00:24:29,790 --> 00:24:36,590
challenge that never stops. Now, I know that the moon doesn't have plate tectonics. Do you know like

211
00:24:38,030 --> 00:24:43,390
what kind of challenges there are with the moon with this similar to what there are with the earth?

212
00:24:43,390 --> 00:24:50,270
Does the moon have a magnetic field or anything? No, you know, it doesn't have a lot of the characteristics

213
00:24:50,270 --> 00:24:57,550
of a planet that we're used to. And so, yeah, we don't have to deal with a lot of those factors.

214
00:24:58,030 --> 00:25:02,830
You know, however, I don't think we know everything about the moon yet.

215
00:25:03,790 --> 00:25:09,470
From what I understand, I think you're right. We're going to find out exciting things soon.

216
00:25:09,470 --> 00:25:15,470
And we're going to go find out. You've talked about how we have multiple atomic clocks around the

217
00:25:15,470 --> 00:25:21,550
earth to measure the different times and then calculate that coordinated universal time.

218
00:25:22,510 --> 00:25:27,550
Do we know how many clocks and where we want to place them on the moon yet?

219
00:25:28,830 --> 00:25:37,550
That's a great question. We don't. You know, the heart of every GPS receiver actually is an okay

220
00:25:37,550 --> 00:25:44,750
clock, but the heart of every device that generates position, navigation timing is a really great clock.

221
00:25:45,390 --> 00:25:51,390
And so, you can imagine that as we begin a footprint on the South Pole and Equatorial,

222
00:25:51,390 --> 00:25:58,110
you're only going to need enough clocks to handle positioning really well in those areas.

223
00:25:58,110 --> 00:26:02,990
And so, maybe you don't need all your clocks at once. We're going to have some clocks on the surface

224
00:26:02,990 --> 00:26:09,630
that are equipped to survive the night. And because clocks, by the way, they like stability,

225
00:26:09,630 --> 00:26:14,270
they like stable temperature. So, they like to be turned on and they like to warm up,

226
00:26:14,270 --> 00:26:19,790
and they like to stay warm. And so, you're going to need continuous power. You're never going to

227
00:26:19,790 --> 00:26:23,950
want to power it down because you'll have to go through a warm up and synchronization cycle.

228
00:26:23,950 --> 00:26:29,870
And so, surviving the night's important. We're also going to have clocks on the satellites in orbit

229
00:26:29,870 --> 00:26:36,270
and in different places around the moon. And all of these clocks will talk to each other

230
00:26:36,270 --> 00:26:43,070
and share data and synchronize so that we can determine, you know, what is time at given points.

231
00:26:43,070 --> 00:26:50,830
We're also going to have clocks on the earth that are going to be tied and forming these

232
00:26:50,830 --> 00:26:56,990
clocks up on the moon. They're in a different gravity well. It's characterized. We know how they're

233
00:26:56,990 --> 00:27:00,830
going to be ticking on the earth. We're going to characterize and know how they're going to be

234
00:27:00,830 --> 00:27:06,030
ticking on the moon. That characterization is what's going to allow us to have them all work together

235
00:27:06,030 --> 00:27:18,330
to form really precise time. Interesting. So, it's kind of a backup and just a system to make

236
00:27:18,330 --> 00:27:25,210
sure that what you're receiving from the moon is what you're expecting to see. Exactly right. Exactly

237
00:27:25,210 --> 00:27:31,130
right. And they're going to be things that happen where you have to make adjustments. And we're going

238
00:27:31,130 --> 00:27:40,410
to see very, very small perturbations based on gravity differences, based on, you know, all kinds

239
00:27:40,410 --> 00:27:46,410
of factors that will have to constantly calculate and factor in. Some clocks may be affected by

240
00:27:47,050 --> 00:27:51,530
something happening in space and maybe the ones on the ground are more shielded and not as impacted.

241
00:27:51,530 --> 00:27:54,650
Those are the kind of errors that you have to constantly look for and work out.

242
00:27:54,650 --> 00:28:03,450
I've got a really good use case for you for why these clocks and why precise positionings important.

243
00:28:05,450 --> 00:28:11,530
Imagine you're an astronaut on the surface of the moon and maybe you've walked away from your

244
00:28:11,530 --> 00:28:19,370
rover a couple hundred meters. And you've got a habitat, maybe a mile or two away. And all of a

245
00:28:19,370 --> 00:28:26,090
sudden you get an alert on your communication system that says, hey, there's a solar flare.

246
00:28:26,810 --> 00:28:34,810
You've got this amount of time to seek cover or you're going to endure some radiation that's above

247
00:28:34,810 --> 00:28:40,330
our safety limits. Well, first thing you're going to want to know is, all right, where do I go?

248
00:28:40,330 --> 00:28:44,170
You're going to have to go back to your habitat. You need the most expedient route.

249
00:28:44,970 --> 00:28:50,330
You're going to navigate back, probably visually. You'll probably see where you park the rover.

250
00:28:50,330 --> 00:28:55,850
You're going to get back, get in that rover, turn around. You're going to have to drive that rover

251
00:28:55,850 --> 00:29:04,010
precisely. Without hitting an obstacle, going around different types of terrain and maybe there's

252
00:29:04,010 --> 00:29:09,770
power cables you have to avoid running over. You're going to need to get there as quick as you can

253
00:29:09,770 --> 00:29:15,290
and you want the most accurate route. And this positioning capability is a way to get that

254
00:29:15,290 --> 00:29:20,650
accurate route. I remember a nanosecond about a third of a meter. And so you need really good

255
00:29:20,650 --> 00:29:27,050
timing accuracy. So you're going to drive back that distance through who knows what obstacles,

256
00:29:27,050 --> 00:29:32,570
what kind of terrain that's been plotted for you, precisely back computer using this position

257
00:29:32,570 --> 00:29:39,370
navigation and timing data and get back into that habitat before these solar winds arrive and

258
00:29:39,370 --> 00:29:46,810
causes health, health concern. So we're talking this is a safety feature and not just

259
00:29:47,530 --> 00:29:51,450
to make sure we get our spacecraft to the moon and back. Absolutely.

260
00:29:53,450 --> 00:30:00,090
So one of the things that you said just a minute ago was that these clocks will have to endure

261
00:30:00,090 --> 00:30:03,930
temperature. Is temperature something that affects time?

262
00:30:06,570 --> 00:30:14,570
You know, it is for me. I'm from Florida when it's cold, things feel like they're moving a

263
00:30:14,570 --> 00:30:22,890
little too slow. But you know what, you know, the way these atomic clocks work is you use a laser

264
00:30:22,890 --> 00:30:27,610
typically to excite an atom into a vibration state and you measure the vibration.

265
00:30:28,410 --> 00:30:35,450
And that's a setting. You want a very predictable outcome and so you want temperature stability.

266
00:30:35,450 --> 00:30:42,650
So many different clocks depending on their mode of generating a stable frequency depend on

267
00:30:44,170 --> 00:30:49,370
an oven or something to warm them up to a certain temperature where their performance is

268
00:30:49,370 --> 00:30:54,170
characterized. That means you know what it is at that temperature and it's predictable.

269
00:30:54,810 --> 00:31:03,530
And so let's say you need something to run at, you know, a megahertz. Very precisely, one dot lots of

270
00:31:03,530 --> 00:31:11,370
zeros. And you've characterized some materials to do that at a certain temperature.

271
00:31:12,490 --> 00:31:16,810
That temperature becomes essential to getting that predictable behavior out of the clock.

272
00:31:16,810 --> 00:31:25,050
Clocks are all about predictable measurements. So this is about making sure that our measurements

273
00:31:25,050 --> 00:31:31,530
are the same. We're recording what this frequency of this atom is at this temperature. So it's

274
00:31:31,530 --> 00:31:37,210
standardized and not that time moves differently in different temperatures. That's correct. That's

275
00:31:37,210 --> 00:31:44,330
correct. Okay. Remember, you know, is there really such thing as time? We know there's such thing as

276
00:31:44,330 --> 00:31:52,090
a vibration of an atom. We know there's such thing as a frequency. But time is just a measurement we

277
00:31:52,090 --> 00:31:59,370
create off of those vibrations. So you could argue that time is just something we created that we

278
00:31:59,370 --> 00:32:06,650
need to be predictable and stable. So we've been talking about the moon here a lot. And we're

279
00:32:06,650 --> 00:32:16,570
going to the moon to then go on to Mars. Looking at these considerations of the gravity and

280
00:32:16,570 --> 00:32:25,850
and the rotation, everything, they're different on Mars. So are we looking at the second being

281
00:32:25,850 --> 00:32:34,640
different on Mars? Well, you know, remember clocks on Mars will take an average of 477 millionth

282
00:32:34,640 --> 00:32:45,440
of a second faster than clocks on Earth. And it's orbit and the gravity from its neighbors can increase

283
00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:51,600
or decrease this amount by as much as 226 microseconds a day over the course of the Martian year.

284
00:32:52,560 --> 00:32:58,880
That's a lot of variability on time. What is the second, right? On the Earth, we have a very

285
00:32:58,880 --> 00:33:06,800
precise definition of a second. If we take that definition to Mars and it's based on the number

286
00:33:06,800 --> 00:33:14,880
of vibrations, it's going to be 477 millionth of a second faster. And so it's going to be different.

287
00:33:14,880 --> 00:33:23,840
It's going to be different. Different gravity means the different rate of vibration of the atoms

288
00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:29,040
when they're at the right temperature, excited by a laser. And when we do that measurement, it's going

289
00:33:29,040 --> 00:33:36,480
to be different. So we're looking at having Earth time, Moon time, and Mars time, all just a little bit

290
00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:41,520
different. That's exactly right. Anytime you go to a different gravity well, you're going to have

291
00:33:41,520 --> 00:33:49,120
different time reference frame. So in 2024, SCaN was tasked by the White House with developing this

292
00:33:49,120 --> 00:33:58,720
coordinated lunar time. How is that project coming along? So really well. You know, the key part of

293
00:33:58,720 --> 00:34:05,680
that is working with the different parts of the government that have roles to play in defining time

294
00:34:05,680 --> 00:34:11,280
on the Earth and how we work together to define time on the Moon. We have an active work going with

295
00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:15,920
the company name and two of the machines to put satellites around the Moon, you know, this

296
00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:22,000
LCRNS acronym, lunar communication relay and nav system. They're well underway. I know they're

297
00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:27,440
wrapping up some of their satellites and preparing to launch them. And you know, the next part is going to be

298
00:34:27,440 --> 00:34:33,040
to once they're on orbit and we have some user equipment on the surface, getting that cranked up,

299
00:34:33,040 --> 00:34:40,000
refining it, and improving that accuracy so that when we send astronauts and more systems to the

300
00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:45,680
surface, they don't only have uninterrupted comm, right? They'll have communications all around the

301
00:34:45,680 --> 00:34:49,920
Moon from these relays orbiting. They'll have position navigation timing wherever they're at.

302
00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:57,920
You mentioned earlier, this is a lot of math, a lot of really difficult math. Has all that math

303
00:34:57,920 --> 00:35:02,800
been completed or is it kind of a new things are popping up and we're having to solve problems as

304
00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:10,460
we find them? Yeah, that's a really good question. So, Dane, I don't have the complete answer to that.

305
00:35:10,460 --> 00:35:17,340
I think there's more math to do, man. You know, there's definitely more math to do. I think

306
00:35:17,340 --> 00:35:23,420
the experts really understand what it's going to take to do this. It's a matter of

307
00:35:24,300 --> 00:35:29,980
giving them time to complete the work. We have to get the clocks up around the Moon in these

308
00:35:29,980 --> 00:35:35,100
satellites and get data back of how it's synchronizing and working. I'm sure there's going to be

309
00:35:35,100 --> 00:35:40,060
adjustments just like there were with the GPS system when we started to put it up around the Earth.

310
00:35:40,060 --> 00:35:47,420
As we see, how does it really play in the environment? I mean, the Moon is going to be a very

311
00:35:47,420 --> 00:35:54,620
interesting environment to solve these problems in. You've got Earth's gravity on one side, you've got

312
00:35:54,620 --> 00:35:59,340
lunar gravity, you've got these different kind of orbits we're going to use around the Moon that are

313
00:35:59,340 --> 00:36:03,580
different from the ones we use around the Earth. So, I'm sure there's going to be fine tuning and

314
00:36:03,580 --> 00:36:10,140
adjustments as we deploy this capability. And, you know, one advantage we have on the Earth is we

315
00:36:10,140 --> 00:36:16,780
can move around the Earth freely and take measurements of the signals we're getting from GPS satellites.

316
00:36:16,780 --> 00:36:21,580
Right now, we can't, we're not yet at that point where we have the ability to take measurements

317
00:36:21,580 --> 00:36:27,340
all over the Moon as fast as these scientists and engineers would like to have this data. And so,

318
00:36:27,340 --> 00:36:31,180
you can imagine that as we continue to take measurements, we're going to continue to have some

319
00:36:31,180 --> 00:36:37,260
adjustments. You had that great example of the astronaut trying to avoid the solar flare. So,

320
00:36:37,260 --> 00:36:43,260
we've seen, you know, that this is a great way for astronauts to track the amount of time they have

321
00:36:43,260 --> 00:36:52,380
and help navigate safely back to their base. We also talked about how having this accurate time

322
00:36:52,380 --> 00:37:01,660
helps make sure that we know where things are in space and not, you know, thousands of kilometers

323
00:37:01,660 --> 00:37:08,220
away from where we think they should be. Are there any other applications to having this accurate

324
00:37:08,220 --> 00:37:16,620
time for the Moon? Well, accurate time means accurate position. And, if you just look down on the

325
00:37:16,620 --> 00:37:24,300
Earth, let's just look at what's fun, right? It's fun to get in your car and program in your GPS

326
00:37:24,300 --> 00:37:29,900
somewhere you want to go and go there. And if you're driving some of these newer electric cars for

327
00:37:29,900 --> 00:37:38,620
it to drive you there itself, it's fun to, it's fun for a kid to have a drone and, you know,

328
00:37:38,620 --> 00:37:43,420
fly that drone around and maybe you're using GPS or time to help you do that.

329
00:37:43,980 --> 00:37:51,340
You know, think about the things that make it really fun here on the Earth using GPS.

330
00:37:51,340 --> 00:37:54,380
Those same things are going to apply on the Moon just a little different way sometimes.

331
00:37:55,340 --> 00:38:03,420
If we wanted to do very precise sampling, very precise sampling of the lunar surface and the near

332
00:38:03,420 --> 00:38:09,660
term, this kind of capability can allow you not only to go to very precise spots and take these

333
00:38:09,660 --> 00:38:15,260
samples, but you can revisit those spots extremely accurately autonomously.

334
00:38:16,940 --> 00:38:25,100
And so, as we explore the Moon with autonomous capabilities, this ability to, for a location to be a

335
00:38:25,100 --> 00:38:31,500
location, no matter when you go, it's going to be a game changer, an absolute game changer.

336
00:38:32,220 --> 00:38:37,260
You know, imagine that you need a lot of systems to work cooperatively together.

337
00:38:37,820 --> 00:38:42,540
And they can each know their very precise location in the same reference frame,

338
00:38:43,180 --> 00:38:48,540
just like we do here on the Earth. I think it's going to provide a lot of advantage.

339
00:38:50,220 --> 00:38:56,380
And that coordination sounds like it's going to be that big leap compared to what we've done

340
00:38:56,380 --> 00:39:00,220
the past where it's been one mission at a time, but having all that coordination

341
00:39:01,180 --> 00:39:06,460
is really going to make the Moon its own place.

342
00:39:07,660 --> 00:39:16,220
Yeah, absolutely. You know, imagine this, imagine a steady stream of robotic missions to the Moon,

343
00:39:17,100 --> 00:39:26,620
where we have to have precise landing, precise placement of logistics, maybe there's some robotic

344
00:39:26,620 --> 00:39:33,420
craft on the Moon that have to go to certain points and retrieve these logistics or do different

345
00:39:33,420 --> 00:39:41,260
missions. The amount of autonomy and capability they're going to have to build a lunar base,

346
00:39:41,260 --> 00:39:47,820
to explore the Moon, to conduct, you know, really precise science is going to be directly

347
00:39:47,820 --> 00:39:55,420
enabled by their ability to have accurate positioning. So, looking back, well, looking forward to

348
00:39:55,420 --> 00:40:05,020
Mars again, we talked about how some of the rover missions were on Mars time, but they didn't have

349
00:40:05,900 --> 00:40:12,860
the all the atomic clocks and all the GPS navigation satellites, everything at four Mars yet.

350
00:40:12,860 --> 00:40:22,060
Do they? Oh no, not yet. Remember, they're on the mission time. And so, they'll have a clock,

351
00:40:22,060 --> 00:40:27,260
but it's the mission clock that they'll be synchronized to. And so, and they operate very

352
00:40:27,260 --> 00:40:32,860
independently of one another. You know, remember, it's old school the way Gemini and Apollo

353
00:40:33,660 --> 00:40:39,100
was done, because there's not distributed infrastructure there. And so, you've got to work

354
00:40:39,100 --> 00:40:43,660
focused solely on that mission and that time for that mission only.

355
00:40:44,860 --> 00:40:50,380
Right, okay, so the people working it were on the day night cycle and not living on the Martian clock.

356
00:40:52,460 --> 00:40:59,100
Okay, so, is Mars our next focus after we get the Moon infrastructure up, we're going to start

357
00:40:59,100 --> 00:41:02,620
looking at putting this infrastructure into Mars? Is that what we're looking at?

358
00:41:03,740 --> 00:41:08,140
You know, our Moon to Mars program says, let's go do the Moon and let's move on to Mars based

359
00:41:08,140 --> 00:41:13,980
on what we learn. So, yeah, absolutely. And, you know, Mars is going to be an interesting problem

360
00:41:13,980 --> 00:41:21,180
to solve. One thing we haven't talked about is the distance of Mars. You know, when we,

361
00:41:21,900 --> 00:41:27,900
you know, right now the Moon is so close, the speed of light distance to the Moon is negligible.

362
00:41:27,900 --> 00:41:34,220
It you don't even notice it. When we talk to Voyager, which is outside of the solar system,

363
00:41:34,220 --> 00:41:41,580
it takes 23 and a half hours for a signal to get from the Earth to Voyager. And then Voyager

364
00:41:41,660 --> 00:41:46,300
does something and sends something back and takes 23 and a half hours more. So, two days

365
00:41:46,860 --> 00:41:55,500
for round trip, comms to Voyager, Mars is an orbiting planet around the Sun. And so, it's not a

366
00:41:55,500 --> 00:42:02,220
set distance from the Earth. The Earth is moving around the Sun at one rate and one orbit,

367
00:42:02,220 --> 00:42:07,980
and Mars is moving around another. And so, the time difference to Mars ranges from four to,

368
00:42:07,980 --> 00:42:15,900
you know, 44 minutes. And so, when it's at a distant point, and I send a radio wave to Mars,

369
00:42:15,900 --> 00:42:20,060
it takes 44 minutes for it to get there, and then 44 minutes for it to get back.

370
00:42:22,380 --> 00:42:30,060
And so, we have to factor that in for when we start doing these Mars missions and we start sending

371
00:42:30,060 --> 00:42:33,180
humans. It's going to be a very different experience than the Moon.

372
00:42:34,060 --> 00:42:41,180
And I'm sure that the lessons that we learn on the Moon are going to inform all of those

373
00:42:41,180 --> 00:42:48,060
challenges that we have going to Mars. Yeah, absolutely. Just like the lessons we learned on the Earth

374
00:42:48,060 --> 00:42:53,180
are giving us huge advantages for how we are applying technology to the Moon.

375
00:42:54,220 --> 00:42:57,660
This has been fantastic. I have learned so much today.

376
00:42:58,540 --> 00:43:05,740
Was I right that you might not be satisfied with all the answers? It's a crazy topic.

377
00:43:07,020 --> 00:43:12,780
You know, the dissatisfaction I have with some of the answers has just inspired me to learn more

378
00:43:12,780 --> 00:43:19,740
about what it takes to tell time on this kind of accurate scale. Oh, that's the goal right there.

379
00:43:20,460 --> 00:43:25,260
Well, thank you so much for coming on and taking the time to talk about time with me.

380
00:43:25,820 --> 00:43:27,260
Absolutely, Dane. Thanks for having me.

381
00:43:46,430 --> 00:43:50,750
Thanks for sticking around. I hope you had a good time. You can check out the latest from around

382
00:43:50,750 --> 00:43:56,590
the agency at NASA.gov and to find out more about SCaN, you can go to NASA.gov slash SCaN.

383
00:43:57,230 --> 00:44:01,470
Our full collection of episodes and all of the other wonderful NASA podcasts can be found

384
00:44:01,470 --> 00:44:07,710
at NASA.gov slash podcasts. On social media, we're on the NASA Johnson Space Center pages of Facebook,

385
00:44:07,710 --> 00:44:12,750
X and Instagram. If you have any questions for us or suggestions for future episodes,

386
00:44:12,750 --> 00:44:20,510
email us at nasa-houstonpodcast at mail.nasa.gov. This interview was recorded on March 10th, 2026.

387
00:44:20,510 --> 00:44:25,550
Our producer is Dane Turner, audio engineers are Will Flato, Daniel Tohill and Mani Cooper,

388
00:44:25,550 --> 00:44:30,510
and our social media is managed by Leah Cheshire and Kelsey Herron. Houston We Have a Podcast was

389
00:44:30,510 --> 00:44:36,030
created and is supervised by Gary Jordan. Special thanks to Catherine Schauer and Kali Dusenbery for

390
00:44:36,030 --> 00:44:40,510
helping us plan and set up this interview. And of course, thanks again to Kevin Coggins for

391
00:44:40,510 --> 00:44:44,110
taking the time to come on the show. Give us a rating and feedback on whatever platform you're

392
00:44:44,110 --> 00:44:47,870
listening to us on and tell us what you think of our podcast. We'll be back next week.

393
00:44:52,140 --> 00:45:02,140
This is an official NASA podcast.

